Contact Hours: 2
This educational activity is credited for 2 contact hours at completion of the activity.
Course Purpose
This course is designed to provide healthcare professionals with the essential knowledge to effectively conduct and benefit from presurgical huddles.
Overview
Healthcare organizations consistently aim to improve the quality of surgical care, yet surgical errors remain a significant threat to patient safety. These errors are believed to account for nearly 75% of surgical malpractice cases. Often, they result from preventable factors such as miscommunication, distractions, interruptions, fatigue, and failure to follow standard procedures during urgent situations. Although healthcare administrators are responsible for facilitating the adoption of surgical huddles, it is ultimately the duty of frontline staff to incorporate them into routine practice. This course is designed to equip healthcare professionals with the knowledge and tools needed to implement presurgical huddles effectively and maximize their benefits.
Course Objectives
Upon completion of this course, the learner will be able to:
- Examine the most frequent surgical errors and identify surgeries that carry the highest risk.
- Explore common challenges faced in surgical settings, including data on the frequency of surgical errors.
- Understand the potential outcomes and impacts associated with surgical errors.
- Learn the steps involved in conducting a presurgical huddle and recognize its advantages.
- Understand effective strategies to improve adherence and minimize the occurrence of missed presurgical huddles.
Policy Statement
This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the policies of CheapCEForNurses.com.
Disclosures
Cheap CE For Nurses, Inc and its authors have no disclosures. There is no commercial support.
To access The Importance of the Presurgical Huddle, purchase this course or a Full Access Pass.
If you already have an account, please sign in here.
To access The Importance of the Presurgical Huddle, purchase this course or a Full Access Pass.
If you already have an account, please sign in here.
| Drain Sponge | A type of medical tool used in wound care. |
| Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organization | A United States-based nonprofit tax-exempt 501 organization that accredits more than 22,000 US health care organizations and programs. |
| Kocher Clamps | Have teethed and serrated jaws that clamp the blood vessels tightly and do not let them slip. |
| Medical Error | An act of omission or commission in planning or execution that contributes or could contribute to an unintended result. |
| Miscommunication | Failure to communicate clearly. |
| Mortality Risk | Provides a medical classification to estimate the likelihood of in-hospital death for a patient. |
| Presurgical Huddle | A commonly utilized process that promotes teamwork and prevents medical errors. |
| Surgical Error | An unintentional, preventable injury occurring in the perioperative period that is not considered a known acceptable risk of surgery and could have been avoided by following appropriate procedure-specific training protocols. |
| Surgical Timeout | The surgical team’s short pause, just before incision, to confirm that they are about to perform the correct procedure on the correct body part of the correct patient. |
| Swiss Cheese Model | Illustrates through layers in a block of Swiss cheese, the processes that can both prevent and cause safety concerns. |
| World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist | Published in 2008 in order to increase the safety of patients undergoing surgery. |
Healthcare organizations consistently work to improve the quality of surgical care; however, surgical errors remain a persistent threat to patient safety.¹ These errors can lead to serious consequences, including significant patient harm and increased mortality. Surgical mistakes account for an estimated 75% of malpractice cases, resulting in an annual financial burden of approximately $5.96 billion to healthcare systems.² Most of these incidents are linked to preventable factors such as miscommunication, interruptions, distractions, provider fatigue, and departures from standard procedures during high-pressure situations. To mitigate these risks and uphold patient safety, healthcare systems must embrace a proactive approach to planning and operations. One such strategy is the implementation of presurgical huddles—structured team discussions conducted before procedures to align the care team and anticipate potential issues. While administrators provide oversight, successful integration of presurgical huddles depends on consistent execution by frontline staff. This course is designed to provide healthcare professionals with the knowledge and tools necessary to effectively implement and benefit from presurgical huddles. With consistent use, these huddles enhance team communication, reduce the likelihood of surgical errors, and contribute to better patient outcomes.
Globally, about 313 million surgeries are performed each year, with an estimated 4.2 million patients dying within 30 days post-operation.³ In the United States, data indicates that over 100,000 patients die annually following elective surgical procedures.⁴ ⁵ However, these figures are likely underestimated due to underreporting, as such deaths often go unrecorded on death certificates or within official mortality statistics. It is important to recognize that surgical mortality risk is not uniform across all procedures. Certain surgeries are categorized as high risk due to the elevated likelihood of complications. These include:⁶
- Lower extremity bypass graft (11% adverse event risk)
- Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (8%)
- Colon resection (5%)
- Coronary artery bypass graft or cardiac valve surgery (4%)
- Transurethral resection of a bladder or prostate tumor (3%)
- Cholecystectomy (3%)
- Hysterectomy (2%)
- Appendectomy (1%)
Approximately 50% of all surgical complications are attributed to technique-related errors, wound infections, and postoperative bleeding, with an estimated 54% considered preventable.⁶
Current Challenges in Surgery
Surgical care requires seamless coordination of decision-making, technical performance, and communication among interdisciplinary team members.⁷ These elements span the entire surgical process, from the initial consultation to post-operative recovery. Given the complex nature of the operating room, surgical environments inherently present numerous opportunities for errors. To mitigate this, teams frequently verify documentation, reassess the environment, and review critical communications. Despite these precautions, errors continue to occur.
Surgical errors refer to unintended, avoidable injuries during the perioperative period that are not expected risks and could have been avoided through proper adherence to procedural protocols.⁸ Common surgical errors include:
- Mislabeled surgical specimens
- Retained foreign objects
- Wrong-patient procedures
- Incorrect procedure
- Wrong-site surgery
Investigations into surgical mistakes reveal that these events often stem from a combination of contributing factors rather than a single error. Ineffective communication has been identified as the primary cause, with 70% of serious adverse events traced back to communication failures, according to The Joint Commission.⁹ Additional common contributors to surgical errors include:¹⁰
- Distractions in the operating room
- Equipment malfunction
- Inadequate training
- Absence of clear leadership
- Burnout among healthcare providers
- Unnecessary or emergency procedures
- Protocol violations
Emergency procedures conducted under time-sensitive conditions can lead to missed steps and snap decisions. Inadequate training reduces clinician confidence and skill, heightening the potential for errors. Equipment issues, whether from poor design, misuse, or maintenance failure, can also be contributing factors. Distractions such as non-essential conversations or alarms may disrupt focus, impairing surgical accuracy. Burnout, brought on by excessive workload and stress, compromises critical thinking and attentiveness. Finally, deviations from established protocols eliminate safety checks and increase error risk.
To conceptualize how these issues align, the “Swiss Cheese” model is often used to describe systemic weaknesses in healthcare.⁶ Each “hole” symbolizes a potential failure point, and when these align across layers of defense, they allow errors to pass through, leading to adverse outcomes.
Errors can arise at multiple stages of the surgical process, including during preoperative planning, patient positioning, anesthesia administration, and intraoperative or postoperative care. These errors may cause procedural delays or lead to serious complications such as bleeding, infections, tissue or organ damage, and death. Common types of surgical errors include:
- Retained foreign objects
- Wrong-site surgeries
- Surgical burns
- Insufficient surgeon presence
- Unavailable or malfunctioning equipment
- Falls in the operating room
Retained Foreign Objects
Retained foreign objects refer to instances where surgical items like clamps, retractors, sponges, gauze, or towels are accidentally left inside a patient’s body. This error occurs in approximately 1 out of every 18,000 surgeries and 1 in every 1,000 abdominal surgeries, accounting for 66.2% of surgical error reports.² Causes often include failure to follow counting protocols, operating room distractions, communication breakdowns, and deviations from standard procedures. These incidents can lead to infections, internal injuries, and often require follow-up surgeries to remove the retained item.
Wrong-Site Surgical Errors
Wrong-site surgery involves performing a procedure on the incorrect part of the body, the wrong patient, or conducting an unintended procedure. These errors are estimated to occur in 1 out of every 100,000 surgeries, representing 15.5% of surgical error cases.² Common causes include miscommunication, poor protocol standardization, and failure to perform proper verification.
Surgical Burns
Surgical burns comprise 8% of reported errors.² They may result from ignition of oxygen during electrocautery use, burns to non-surgical sites, improper use of alcohol-based antiseptics, or grounding pad malfunction. Failure to follow manufacturer guidelines or safety protocols can increase the risk of these incidents.
Insufficient Surgeon Presence, Equipment Issues, and Falls
Roughly 10% of surgical errors are linked to insufficient surgeon presence, equipment-related issues, or falls in the operating room.²
- Insufficient Surgeon Presence occurs when the lead surgeon is absent during part of the operation or fails to provide adequate supervision. This may happen due to overlapping responsibilities, emergencies, or scheduling issues, leading to delayed decisions and inconsistent surgical planning.
- Equipment Unavailability or Failure can stem from poor inventory practices, maintenance neglect, or design flaws. This includes malfunctioning cautery devices, damaged instruments, or defective imaging equipment, all of which can disrupt procedures and cause patient harm.
- Falls in the Operating Room can involve either the patient or surgical staff. Patients may fall during transfers or due to inadequate restraints, while team members may trip on clutter, slip on wet floors, or wear inappropriate footwear. These incidents can interrupt surgery and lead to further injuries or complications.
Consequences of Surgical Errors
Surgical errors carry significant consequences for patients, healthcare professionals, and institutions.¹¹
- For patients, these events often result in longer hospitalizations, increased medical costs, additional procedures, and higher mortality risk. They may also cause emotional trauma and loss of trust in the healthcare system.
- For providers, the psychological impact can be severe.¹² Many experience guilt, anxiety, depression, and diminished confidence. This emotional toll can impair job performance and contribute to burnout. Legal and professional consequences may also arise, including lawsuits, disciplinary action, and reputational harm.
- For healthcare institutions, surgical errors can lead to legal liability, financial penalties, and increased regulatory scrutiny. They may damage the organization’s public image, reduce patient trust, and negatively impact patient volume and satisfaction.
A presurgical huddle is a structured, team-based meeting held before surgical procedures begin. Its primary purpose is to review surgical cases, anticipate potential issues, and establish clear expectations. This meeting allows surgical team members to discuss patient-specific details, address concerns, and confirm roles and responsibilities. Although not strictly scheduled, presurgical huddles are typically held early in the morning to review all cases for the day or the evening before surgery.
Presurgical huddles differ from surgical timeouts. While both involve communication and coordination, they occur at different stages. The presurgical huddle takes place before the first patient enters the operating room, focusing on overall preparation for the day’s surgeries. In contrast, a surgical timeout is performed just before making the first incision with the patient on the table. It involves verifying patient identity, the consented procedure, and the correct surgical site, often using a standardized checklist such as the World Health Organization (WHO) surgical safety checklist. Separate timeouts are required for procedures involving multiple surgical teams.
Documentation of presurgical huddles is typically required. This includes a summary of discussion points, any risks or concerns identified, decisions made, and acknowledgment of team members’ participation. Changes to the surgical plan during the huddle should also be recorded. This documentation supports transparency, accountability, and continuity of care. It serves as a reference for future review and ensures all relevant team members remain informed.
Historical Context
The rise in the use of presurgical huddles stems from increasing awareness of medical error risks. The 1999 Institute of Medicine report “To Err is Human” brought attention to the large number of preventable surgical and medical errors, attributing nearly 100,000 deaths annually to such events.¹⁶ More recent studies have suggested that medical errors may cause up to 400,000 deaths per year among hospitalized patients.¹⁷ Financially, these errors cost the healthcare system an estimated $20 billion annually, with hospital-acquired infections alone accounting for $35 to $45 billion.¹⁸ This data emphasized the need to address communication failures and promote teamwork through methods such as presurgical huddles, which improve team collaboration and patient safety.
Challenges to Nationwide Implementation
Despite recognition of their importance, presurgical huddles are not uniformly implemented across all healthcare settings.¹⁹ Facilities with strong quality improvement programs are more likely to adopt them as standard practice. These institutions usually have the structure and support to facilitate routine, interdisciplinary meetings. In contrast, facilities without such programs may encounter barriers like insufficient staffing, time limitations, and competing responsibilities. Cultural resistance can also impede implementation, particularly in high-volume or fast-paced departments where huddles are perceived as time-consuming or unnecessary.²⁰ Nonetheless, there is a growing consensus among professional organizations, accrediting agencies, and patient safety advocates that presurgical huddles are a valuable tool for reducing surgical risks and improving outcomes.
Isolated studies have shown that presurgical huddles are a valuable tool in reducing surgical errors and improving patient safety. Surgeons have reported that these huddles lead to smoother workflows and fewer interruptions during procedures, as questions about upcoming cases are addressed beforehand.¹⁹ One of the primary benefits of presurgical huddles is the enhancement of communication among surgical team members.²¹ During these meetings, team members openly discuss the day’s surgical schedule, including specific patient details, procedural steps, equipment needs, and any potential complications. This collaborative environment allows for the proactive identification and resolution of concerns.
For example, in preparation for a complex procedure, the surgeon may outline the surgical plan while the anesthesia provider discusses sedation strategies and risks. The operating room nurse may review available equipment and medications. If a nurse raises concern over a newly noted allergy in the patient’s chart, the team can immediately plan accordingly, reducing the likelihood of an adverse reaction.
Presurgical huddles also play a critical role in preventing serious surgical errors such as wrong-site surgeries and equipment failures.¹⁹ By thoroughly reviewing the surgical schedule and verifying patient information before procedures begin, the team can detect and correct errors. For instance, in a scheduled left knee arthroscopy, the huddle reveals a consent form error listing the right knee. This issue, if left unnoticed, could have resulted in wrong-site surgery and legal consequences. By identifying the discrepancy early, the team can correct it and proceed safely.
Data shows that presurgical huddles significantly reduce the number of interruptions during surgeries and decrease the need for additional clarifications throughout the day by 77%.¹⁹ These huddles streamline workflows by ensuring that all information, personnel, and equipment are prepared in advance.²² In a high-volume surgical department, for example, a huddle may reveal that critical equipment for a laparoscopic procedure is not yet sterilized. Addressing this issue early allows the team to prepare in time and avoid delays.
Ultimately, presurgical huddles promote a culture of safety, reducing complications and improving outcomes. Consider a patient with a known difficult airway. During the huddle, the anesthesia team highlights the need for specialized equipment and ensures a senior anesthetist is available. This proactive measure prepares the team to respond effectively, minimizing the risk of complications and supporting a successful surgical outcome.
Conducting a presurgical huddle involves a structured sequence of essential steps aimed at improving communication, minimizing errors, and ensuring patient safety.¹⁹ The process begins by reviewing the surgical schedule, with the first case selected for discussion. The surgical team verifies the patient’s identity using at least three identifiers, such as full name, date of birth, and medical record number, ensuring these match the wristband, medical record, and consent form. Next, the surgical site is verified by involving the patient when possible, marking the site, and cross-referencing with the consent form and records to prevent wrong-site surgery. The team then checks equipment and supplies to confirm that all necessary tools are present, sterile, and functioning properly.
Following these checks, the lead surgeon outlines the surgical plan and discusses critical aspects such as procedure duration, expected complications, blood loss risks, patient-specific factors, and post-operative care.²² Contingency plans for potential issues are also reviewed. Each team member’s responsibilities are confirmed, including the anesthesia provider’s monitoring and management plan and preparations for complications. The huddle concludes with a discussion of any final concerns or questions.
Key Participants in a Presurgical Huddle
A typical surgical team includes various professionals with distinct but interdependent roles.⁹ Lead surgeons, surgical residents, anesthesia providers, nurses, surgical technicians, pharmacists, and sometimes non-medical staff collaborate to ensure safe and efficient care. Nurses, the largest professional group involved, play central roles throughout the process.²⁴
The lead surgeon plays a pivotal role by outlining the procedure, detailing anticipated challenges, and aligning the team on surgical steps.³ Surgical residents assist under supervision and must be fully briefed on the plan to participate effectively.
Anesthesia providers contribute vital information about the patient’s medical history, proposed anesthesia method, monitoring procedures, and potential risks, such as allergies or past reactions.³
Circulating and scrub nurses are essential to OR management.²³ Circulating nurses ensure the OR environment is ready, oversee documentation, and advocate for patient safety. Scrub nurses handle sterile instruments during surgery and confirm tool readiness, helping prevent delays or contamination.
Surgical technicians prepare the OR by sterilizing and organizing instruments and confirming their availability and function during the huddle.²⁵ They support the procedure by anticipating the surgeon’s needs and ensuring efficiency.
Pharmacists review and confirm medication plans, dosages, possible drug interactions, and allergies, and ensure medications are accurate and available.²⁶ Radiology technicians handle imaging needs, equipment, and readiness for intraoperative reviews.²⁷ Pathologists or pathology assistants may provide real-time biopsy analysis to inform surgical decisions and ensure rapid results.²⁸
Non-medical participants may also be involved depending on institutional policies.²⁹ These may include operating room coordinators, who manage scheduling and logistics; patient representatives, who relay special needs or family concerns; and IT staff, who support electronic systems and resolve technical issues that may interfere with surgery. Their involvement ensures comprehensive team support across clinical and operational dimensions.
Skipping presurgical huddles can lead to serious risks that impact both patient safety and surgical outcomes.¹¹ Without this structured communication, the team may fail to identify critical concerns or adequately prepare for the procedure, increasing the chances of adverse events. Risks associated with omitting a presurgical huddle include breakdowns in communication, lack of readiness, increased procedural errors, and reduced patient safety.
If a presurgical huddle is missed or performed incompletely, healthcare facilities must act immediately to manage the situation. Clear protocols should be in place to mitigate risks and maintain safety. These include:
- Immediate notification – The appropriate personnel, such as the surgical team leader or charge nurse, should be informed immediately. This ensures the issue is acknowledged and addressed promptly.
- Reporting – The missed huddle should be reported according to the facility’s incident reporting guidelines. This step ensures accountability and helps the institution monitor safety lapses.
- Documentation – Detailed records of the missed huddle must be kept, including the reason for omission and any remedial actions taken. This facilitates clear communication and supports ongoing quality improvement efforts.
- Emergency huddle – A brief but focused huddle should be conducted immediately to review the surgical plan, address urgent concerns, and ensure alignment among team members before the procedure begins.
To ensure presurgical huddles become a consistent and routine part of surgical preparation, the following compliance strategies should be implemented:
- Standardized protocols – Clear and consistent guidelines for conducting presurgical huddles help unify team practices across departments and reduce variability in implementation.
- Leadership support – When leaders actively promote and participate in huddles, they reinforce a culture of safety and highlight the importance of communication and preparation.
- Education and training – Ongoing education helps ensure all surgical staff understand the goals, structure, and value of huddles. Training prepares team members to contribute effectively and consistently.
- Regular audits and feedback – Periodic reviews help assess compliance and effectiveness of huddle practices. Feedback allows facilities to correct deficiencies, recognize high performance, and drive continuous improvement.
Structured protocols like presurgical huddles are essential in promoting surgical safety, with surgical nurses serving as vital contributors to their success.³⁰ Acting as communicators, coordinators, and patient advocates, nurses help lead the huddle alongside the surgeon. Their responsibilities include verifying patient details, confirming the availability and functionality of required equipment, discussing possible complications, and ensuring all team members are aligned on the surgical plan.
To fulfill this role effectively, nurses must develop and maintain several key competencies. Strong communication skills are essential for conveying patient information, addressing concerns, and promoting understanding among team members. Nurses must be assertive, clear, and active listeners, capable of resolving any confusion that may arise during the huddle. Organizational skills are equally important. Nurses coordinate schedules, prepare accurate documentation, and ensure interdepartmental communication to secure all necessary resources for the surgical procedure.
Attention to detail is critical in preventing adverse outcomes. Surgical nurses are tasked with verifying patient identity, surgical sites, and supply readiness while paying close attention to team input to avoid overlooking crucial information. Adaptability and problem-solving skills also play a significant role, allowing nurses to handle unforeseen complications such as equipment malfunctions or changes in patient status. In such situations, nurses must act quickly and collaboratively to keep the surgical process on track.
Additionally, nurses serve as the primary patient advocates.³¹ They communicate patient-specific concerns and ensure those needs are prioritized within the surgical plan. This advocacy does not end with the huddle; nurses continue to monitor and support the patient throughout the surgical process, safeguarding their well-being.
Professional development is key to sustaining and enhancing nurses’ proficiency in leading and participating in presurgical huddles. Training sessions, continuing education, and simulation-based learning can reinforce best practices and help nurses sharpen communication, leadership, and decision-making skills necessary for effective huddle participation. These educational efforts support a culture of safety and reinforce the nurse’s leadership role in surgical preparation.
The growing recognition of surgical errors and their impact has highlighted the critical need to strengthen patient safety across all healthcare environments, particularly within surgical care. In response, healthcare organizations have prioritized strategies aimed at minimizing errors, fostering effective communication, and improving teamwork. Presurgical huddles have emerged as a vital approach in achieving these objectives. By gathering the interdisciplinary surgical team to review the day’s schedule, anticipate complications, and confirm the availability of necessary resources, these structured meetings promote shared understanding and alignment among team members. This coordinated communication significantly reduces preventable errors and contributes to improved patient safety and surgical outcomes.
Beyond mitigating risks, presurgical huddles also cultivate a culture of collaboration and mutual respect. They encourage inclusive discussions where every team member’s perspective is acknowledged, fostering stronger teamwork, operational efficiency, and professional satisfaction. Huddles help streamline surgical workflows by preventing delays, ensuring readiness, and optimizing operating room utilization—ultimately improving time management and resource efficiency across surgical departments. Nurses are central to the success of these huddles, as they guide the process, ensure essential elements are addressed, and promote effective communication. To carry out these responsibilities, nurses must possess strong communication and organizational skills, attention to detail, adaptability, and a commitment to continuous professional development.
Despite their proven benefits, implementing presurgical huddles consistently can be hindered by barriers such as resistance to change, staffing limitations, and time pressures. Addressing these challenges requires institutional support, including robust quality improvement frameworks, strong leadership advocacy, and ongoing staff education. Regular audits and feedback systems further support long-term success by helping healthcare organizations monitor compliance, identify areas for improvement, and integrate huddles into routine surgical practice. As efforts to improve patient safety continue to evolve, presurgical huddles will remain an essential element in delivering safe, coordinated, and high-quality surgical care.
- Meara, J. G., Leather, A. J. M., Hagander, L., Alkire, B. C., Alonso, N., Ameh, E. A., Bickler, S. W., Conteh, L., Dare, A. J., Davies, J., Mérisier, E. D., El-Halabi, S., Farmer, P. E., Gawande, A., Gillies, R., Greenberg, S. L. M., Grimes, C. E., Gruen, R. L., Ismail, E. A., & Kamara, T. B. (2015). Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. The Lancet, 386(9993), 569–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60160-x
- Cohen, A. J., Lui, H., Zheng, M., Cheema, B., Patino, G., Kohn, M. A., Enriquez, A., & Breyer, B. N. (2021). Rates of Serious Surgical Errors in California and Plans to Prevent Recurrence. JAMA Network Open, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7058
- Tschan, F., Keller, S., Semmer, N. K., Zimmermann, J., Huber, S. A., Wrann, S., Hübner, M., Banz, V., Prevost, G. A., Marschall, J., Candinas, D., Demartines, N., Weber, M., & Beldi, G. (2021). Effects of structured intraoperative briefings on patient outcomes: Multicentre before-and-after study. British Journal of Surgery, 109(1), 136-144. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab384
- Better care for surgical patients: Recognizing and responding to the unexpected to save lives. (n.d.). Ihpi.umich.edu. https://ihpi.umich.edu/news/ihpi-briefs/FTR
- Makary, M. A., & Daniel, M. (2016). Medical error—The Third Leading Cause of Death in the US. BMJ, 353(8056), i2139. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2139
- Sarker, S. K., & Vincent, C. (2004). Errors in surgery. International Journal of Surgery, 3(1), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2005.04.003
- Hussain, A. K., Kakakhel, M. M., Ashraf, M. F., Shahab, M., Ahmad, F., Luqman, F., Ahmad, M., Nour, A. M., Varrassi, G., & Kinger, S. (2023). Innovative Approaches to Safe Surgery: A Narrative Synthesis of Best Practices. Cureus, 15(11). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.49723
- Marsh, K. M., Turrentine, F. E., Knight, K., Attridge, E., Chen, X., Vittitow, S., & Jones, R. S. (2022). Defining and Studying Errors in Surgical Care: A Systematic Review. Annals of Surgery, 275(6), 1067–1073. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005351
- Teunissen, C., Burrell, B., & Maskill, V. (2019). Effective Surgical Teams: An Integrative Literature Review. Western Journal of Nursing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945919834896
- Parikh, R., Palmer, V., Kumar, A., & Simon, J. W. (2019). Surgical Confusions in Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.07.013
- Giddins, G. (2024). Surgical complications: Errors and adverse events. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934231206317
- Siddaiah-Subramanya, M., To, H., & Haigh, C. (2021). The psychosocial impact of surgical complications on the operating surgeon: A scoping review. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102530
- Agency, A. | W., Dallas Integrated Creative Communications. (n.d.). Essential Concepts in Perioperative Huddles and Time Outs. SASGOG Pearls of Exxcellence | the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics & Gynecology. Retrieved May 29, 2024, from https://www.exxcellence.org/list-of-pearls/essential-concepts-in-perioperative-huddles-and-time-outs/
- Mejia, O. A. V., & Fernandes, P. M. P. (2022). Checklists as a central part of surgical safety culture. Sao Paulo Medical Journal, 140(4), 515–517. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2022.140404052022
- Gul, F., Nazir, M., Abbas, K., Khan, A. A., Malick, D. S., Khan, H., Haider Kazmi, S. N., & Naseem, A. O. (2022). Surgical safety checklist compliance: The clinical audit. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104397
- Medicine, I. of. (1999). To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. In nap.nationalacademies.org. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/9728/to-err-is-human-building-a-safer-health-system
- James, J. T. (2013). A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care. Journal of Patient Safety, 9(3), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0b013e3182948a69
- Ahsani-Estahbanati, E., Gordeev, V. S., & Doshmangir, L. (2022). Interventions to reduce the incidence of medical error and its financial burden in health care systems: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Frontiers in Medicine, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.875426
- Jain, A. L., Jones, K. C., Simon, J., & Patterson, M. D. (2015). The impact of a daily pre-operative surgical huddle on interruptions, delays, and surgeon satisfaction in an orthopedic operating room: a prospective study. Patient Safety in Surgery, 9(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-015-0057-6
- Nilsen, P., Seing, I., Ericsson, C., Birken, S. A., & Schildmeijer, K. (2020). Characteristics of successful changes in health care organizations: An interview study with physicians, registered nurses and assistant nurses. BMC Health Services Research, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4999-8
- Hullfish, K., Morris, K., Hall, E., & Rich, G. (2017). Pre-Surgical Huddles Improve Operating Room Efficiency and Teamwork [25D]. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 129, 48S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000514371.91739.7c
- Scofield, H., Teigen, K., Blair, S., Rechter, G. R., & Webb, B. (2021). Implementation of a Preoperative Huddle at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Journal of Patient Safety, 18(4), e747–e752. https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000000943
- Gong, J., Sheng, B., Bian, C., & Yang, L. (2021). A survey of surgical team members’ awareness and perceptions toward the implementation of the surgical safety checklist in gynecological and obstetrical operations. Medicine, 100(30). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026731
- Ališić, E., Krupić, M., Alić, J., Grbić, K., Mašić, N., Parvaneh, S., & Krupić, F. (2023). The Role of an Assistant Nurse in Implementing the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist: Perception and Perspectives. Cureus, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38854
- Shields, L. B. E., Pate, A. M., Young, M. W., & Flanders, K. (2022). Surgical Technologist Apprentice Program: An Innovative Approach to Improve Staffing. AORN Journal, 117(1), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/aorn.13846
- Wireko, A. A., Tenkorang, P. O., Adebusoye, F. T., Asieduwaa, O. Y., Mehta, A., Debrah, A. F., Oti, V. N., Ng, J. C., Abdul-Rahman, T., & Sikora, V. (2023). The importance of pharmacists in modern day surgery – editorial. International Journal of Surgery (London, England), 109(2), 88-90. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000146
- (2022). The role of radiologist in the changing world of healthcare: A White Paper of the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights Into Imaging, 13(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01241-4
- Angerilli, V., Galuppini, F., Pagni, F., Fusco, N., Malapelle, U., & Fassan, M. (2021). The Role of the Pathologist in the Next-Generation Era of Tumor Molecular Characterization. Diagnostics, 11(2), 339. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020339
- Pimentel, C. B., Snow, A. L., Carnes, S. L., Shah, N. R., Loup, J. R., Vallejo-Luces, T. M., Madrigal, C., & Hartmann, C. W. (2021). Huddles and their effectiveness at the frontlines of clinical care: A scoping review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 36(9), 2772-2783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06632-9
- Singh, B. C., & Arulappan, J. (2023). Operating Room Nurses’ Understanding of Their Roles and Responsibilities for Patient Care and Safety Measures in Intraoperative Practice. SAGE Open Nursing, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608231186247
- Heck, L. O., Carrara, B. S., Mendes, I. A. C., & Arena Ventura, C. A. (2022). Nursing and advocacy in health: An integrative review. Nursing Ethics, 29(4), 1014–1034. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330211062981
- Khorammakan, R., Roudbari, S. H., Omid, A., Anoosheh, V. S., Arabkhazaei, A. N., Arabkhazaei, A. Z., Khalili, J., Chaldashti, H. B., & Ghadami, A. (2024). Continuous training based on the needs of operating room nurses using web application: A new approach to improve their knowledge. BMC Medical Education, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05315-3
To access The Importance of the Presurgical Huddle, purchase this course or a Full Access Pass.
If you already have an account, please sign in here.
To access The Importance of the Presurgical Huddle, purchase this course or a Full Access Pass.
If you already have an account, please sign in here.